Was able to find a few minutes to do a comparison of the Allan Variance curves. In looking back a few years, I think that our approach to ARW parameter development was a bit handicapped and probably should have been closer to 3 deg/sqrt(hour). This offers what our characterization revealed, but we are looking forward to better understanding your test methods, as the ADIS16251 response seems to be closer to what we would expect on the ADIS16265, which by the way, uses a better-performing gyroscope core than the ADIS16251 did.
