Yes, a 0.1uF CFTLR would provide adequate noise averaging. By lowering the communication speed on the BPSK signal, only the phase content changes and not the amplitude or frequency, hence the value of CFLTR cap does not need to change.
↧
Channel:
EngineerZone: Message List
X
Are you the publisher?
Claim or
contact us
about this channel.
X
0
Channel Details:
- Title: EngineerZone: Message List
- Channel Number: 14928013
- Language: English
- Registered On: June 6, 2013, 6:37 am
- Number of Articles: 28044
- Latest Snapshot: August 26, 2018, 11:11 pm
- RSS URL: http://ez.analog.com/community/feeds/messages?rssusername=tkerby
- Publisher: https://ez.analog.com/?view=discussions
- Description: Most recent forum messages
- Catalog: //engineerzone27.rssing.com/catalog.php?indx=14928013
© 2025 //www.rssing.com